The
book entitled, Cure Unknown: Inside the Lyme Epidemic by Pamela Wientraub is
not only a groundbreaking but also a controversial narrative investigation into
the history is a patient experience Lyme disease. The question on whether Weintraub
successfully researched her topic and established herself as unbiased authority
is one that calls for intense debate. Careful analysis of the entire research
clearly show that Wientraub was a great researcher, hence undoubtedly
established herself as an authority in evidenced from her robust introduction
and review of literature. Despite the answer is only to be addressed using
evidences from part two of this research study, one can authoritatively report
that the development and organization of this study right from the introduction
to the conclusion was indeed incredible. Therefore, her excellent introduction,
her power analysis of literature to justify her topic of discussion, and her
appropriate choice of methodology makes her undistinguished researcher and unbiased
authority in this field of research.

In the
background, she is able to justify her extraordinary ability as undistinguished
authority by providing a detailed or in-depth personal story of herself and the
disease. She properly unearths the setting and scope of her study, all of which
are incredible components of any research. She demonstrates how early 1990s
marked a paradigm shift in her life both to the better as they were moving to
the United States, a nation described by many as the land of opportunities and
to the worse as her entire family was attacked by Lyme disease.  She says, “Then, in 1993, I moved with my
husband and two sons, then aged five and nine, to Chappaqua, a town in suburban
Westchester County just north of New York City.” Her family had made their mind
to move to relocate to idyllic wooded neighborhood based in the Suburban parts
of the United States. However, while staying there, the entire family members
developed the illness, which was characterized by a laundry list of confounding
symptoms. She says, “From 1993 to the year 2000, we all began to get sick”. She
further asserts that “At first, the illness was subtle: the headaches, joint
pains, and bone weariness seemed par for the course in our busy suburban lives.
But as the years passed, the symptoms intensified and multiplied, burgeoning
into gross signs of disease”. These symptoms included painful swollen knee
joint, pounding headache, crushing fatigue among other symptoms. It was after
experiencing these symptoms that the author realizes that they had encountered
Lyme disease from the infected deer ticks present in the beautiful woods
outside their respective doorsteps. The manner in which she develops the scope
and setting of her study is incredible, making her undisputed authority in this
field.

Further,
she was able to demonstrate her extraordinary ability by providing a detailed point
background of the events that happened while with her family in the US. For
instance, she vividly displays a disturbing picture crippling uncertainty and
intense controversy that surrounds Lyme disease. Despite being new to the US,
they were welcome with Lyme, a disease that attacked Wientraub’s entire family
leaving her confused on what to do to save lives. She appropriately discloses
her odyssey in the land of Lyme as a result of her husband, their two sons, and
her developing a serious Lyme disease at the commencement of the 1990s. She is
able to show how dangerous the Lyme disease is and the effects that the disease
has had on her family, as well as, her not only physically but also psychologically.
She displays the need or the rationale for developing strategies and mechanisms
to ensure that preventive strategies are integrated as soon as possible. As
highlighted in the book, Lyme disease is dangerous and can quickly claim
somebody’s lives if not addressed in good time.

She
also displayed statistics to show how severe and harmful the Lyme disease was.

For instance, she uses
the data from the Center for Disease and Prevention (CDC), a renowned research
organization to provide statistical information about the Lyme disease. From
the analysis, she argues that the CDC approximated two hundred thousand new
cases of Lyme disease, showing that it has overtaken TB and AIDS and now it is
the fastest spreading infectious disease in the US.  Based on the nature of the disease, some
physicians have been unable or out rightly unwilling to diagnose Lyme, since
they understand the consequences the disease can have on a human body. The
disease if left untreated, it not only becomes chronic but also causes
disabling conditions that are either difficult or may not be cured for life. It’s
clear that she was able to provide an authentic evidence to justify her
analysis with reliable statistics.

She
criticizes other scientists for only remaining interested on money and failing
to provide detailed research about the effects of the disease. For instance,
she says

“From
where I sit, a group of scientists, motivated by money and politics and perhaps
 

most of
all by ego and turf, have vastly oversimplified an emerging epidemic involving  

Lyme as
well as associated tick-borne infections right in our own backyards. They have

steamrollered
scientifically complex findings about Lyme, proven by other academic

researchers,
with cookie-cutter guidelines and dogmatic points of view”

The above criticism also
paints her as unbiased authority in this field. She also outlines the
consequences that have resulted from the failure of scientists to be honest and
focus on developing a robust research about the Lyme disease rather than
focusing on the selfish interests, which is money. She asserts, “In their wake
they have left a tragedy, thousands of patients, including children, who could
have been diagnosed early and cured, who went on instead to a chronic illness
they suffer through every day. In its late stages, Lyme can be a devastating,
disabling disease”.

In
summary, it is clear from the above analysis that Weintraub did not only
managed to successfully research her topic, but also establish herself as
unbiased authority. She developed a robust literature analysis and provided
statistics from authoritative organizations, like the CDC, as an evidence that
the Lyme disease was extremely dangerous and there was a need to address how to
curtail its effects in society. Weintraub conducted a literature analysis to
not only argue out her point but also show how the Lyme disease was dangerous.
In fact, she was able to effectively use authoritative databases for purposes
of collecting her literatures. This makes her literature findings highly
reliable and valid. Therefore, the findings in her study could be used as a
guide or a blueprint for developing policies for preventing the Lyme disease.