The global topic that will be discussed is a women’s fight to leadership roles in and outside of the workplace. The study of leadership is one of the most studied subjects in the world but is inadequately represented. Admittingly, there have been countless attempts to break through patriarchy and begin social experiments.
The hierarchy used to be seen as complex as it is linked to the domination of men over women. Once cooperatives and networks were introduced, women began to empower themselves. The methodology used to strike the argumentation as to why women are underrepresented in management and elected positions is the cultural and structural barriers of the glass ceiling as well as the arguments of John Rawls, the “Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women”, which calls for equality between women and men in all aspects of rights and assistance in good works.
Along with the significant racial and ethnic differences that lengthen the shortcomings of success from their male counterparts that license the top jobs. Suitably, every countries carries their own barriers to leadership positions, despite this actuality, this paper will be rational and recognize these differences. BibliographyBallenger, J. (2010). Women’s Access to Higher Education Leadership: Cultural and Structural Barriers. ERIC. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.
gov/?id=EJ913023 The author thoroughly expresses the barrier that is the glass ceiling. The phenomenon of the glass ceiling appears to be discriminatory while affecting the highest education of women. It identifies womens lack of admittance to leadership status. However, the under representation of women in leadership positions raised questions about how they got to this point.John Rawls argues that there are two principles to be disputed. The first regards the comparable right to authorization of the entire systems.
The second is correlated with the greatest communal and budgetary benefits and attaching the benefits to positions in a candid and equal demeanor. His argument stems from the idea that organizations are obligated not only to security and safety but also to amend unequal opportunity. A strength that is prevalent in the discussion is the individual perspective.
Even supposing it is not a topic on its own, it does relate to the initial phenomenon of the glass ceiling. The underlying idea is that men and women are distinct. Women are thought to view the world differently than men whether it be their attitude toward socialization or their authentic life experiences. The whole topic is based off of moral alternatives in freedom. Stereotypes in the glass ceiling stem from the variations between men and women.
The work of men has been valued over the work of women thus being perceived as inferior and be given a lesser prestige. I plan to take up the idea of the glass ceiling as well as John Rawls’ altercation in conformance of this phenomenon in my paper because it expresses a general understanding of the fight leadership and their barrier to which women have to address.
