It is just an "easy to understand and easy to try" implementation. Oporto, Portugal. November Jose Antonio Martin H. Matlab BackPropagation This implementation is specially designed for neuro-evolution since all the weights are represented in a vector which is then automatically decoded in the evaluate function. I used this same software in the Reinforcement Learning Competitions and I have won!. This should not happen with Matlab release from version 7.

This code is a simple implementation of the SARSA Reinforcement Learning algorithm without eligibility traces, but you can easily extend it and add more features due to the simplicity and modularity of this implementation. Enjoy it! I am sorry for not having at this time more theoretical material at hand but you can write me if you want to talk about or even better, join the rl-list at Google. The Agent cannot see the position of the car but only its speed!!!. Python Code of the n-dimensional linspace function nd-linspace python and numpy.

Matlab BackPropagation. This implementation is specially designed for neuro-evolution since all the weights are represented in a vector which is then automatically decoded in the evaluate function. Python Code pure pythonplease download both two files which are needed by the Neural Net. This Network performs better than back propagation.

Download the Package RLearning for python. Also, a win32 installer is provided. Download the Package FAReinforcement for python:. Please note that in some versions of Matlab you should delete some empty parenthesis in order avoid some errors. Mountain Car:. Please note that this is a Matlab implementation, not the competition one originally in pythonand is made for academic purposes so it is not optimized for performance or software quality design. Matlab Dyna-H implementation for path finding in a Maze problem:.

Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes:. Mountain Car internal clock experiment:. Classifier System XCS in python:. Matlab implementation of neuro-evolution learning for robot control:. This software is part of a research paper on neuro-evolutionary methods for multi-link robots, such as the three link planar robot and the SCARA robot.We turn now to the use of TD prediction methods for the control problem.

As usual, we follow the pattern of generalized policy iteration GPIonly this time using TD methods for the evaluation or prediction part. As with Monte Carlo methods, we face the need to trade off exploration and exploitation, and again approaches fall into two main classes: on-policy and off-policy. In this section we present an on-policy TD control method. The first step is to learn an action-value function rather than a state-value function.

In particular, for an on-policy method we must estimate for the current behavior policy and for all states and actions. This can be done using essentially the same TD method described above for learning. Recall that an episode consists of an alternating sequence of states and state-action pairs: In the previous section we considered transitions from state to state and learned the values of states. Now we consider transitions from state-action pair to state-action pair, and learn the value of state-action pairs.

Formally these cases are identical: they are both Markov chains with a reward process. If is terminal, then is defined as zero. This rule uses every element of the quintuple of events,that make up a transition from one state-action pair to the next. This quintuple gives rise to the name Sarsa for the algorithm. It is straightforward to design an on-policy control algorithm based on the Sarsa prediction method.

As in all on-policy methods, we continually estimate for the behavior policyand at the same time change toward greediness with respect to. Figure 6. The convergence properties of the Sarsa algorithm depend on the nature of the policy's dependence on. For example, one could use -greedy or -soft policies. According to Satinder Singh personal communicationSarsa converges with probability to an optimal policy and action-value function as long as all state-action pairs are visited an infinite number of times and the policy converges in the limit to the greedy policy which can be arranged, for example, with -greedy policies by settingbut this result has not yet been published in the literature.By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service.

The dark mode beta is finally here. Change your preferences any time. Stack Overflow for Teams is a private, secure spot for you and your coworkers to find and share information. I understand that the general "learning" step takes the form of:. Where L is the learning rate, r is the reward associated to a,sQ s',a' is the expected reward from an action a' in the new state s' and D is the discount factor.

Firstly, I don't undersand the role of the term - Q a,swhy are we re-subtracting the current Q-value? Secondly, when picking actions a and a' why do these have to be random? I believe this is Epsilon-Greedy? Why not to this also to pick which Q a,s value to update? Or why not update all Q a,s for the current s? Why, say, not also look into an hypothetical Q s'',a''?

### SARSA Reinforcement Learning

I guess overall my questions boil down to what makes SARSA better than another breath-first or depth-first search algorithm? Why do we subtract Q a,s? In theory, this is the value that Q a,s should be set to. However, we won't always take the same action after getting to state s from action aand the rewards associated with going to future states will change in the future. Instead, we just want to push it in the right direction so that it will eventually converge on the right value.

**Reinforcement Learning in the OpenAI Gym (Tutorial) - SARSA**

This is the amount that we would need to change Q a,s by in order to make it perfectly match the reward that we just observed. Since we don't want to do that all at once we don't know if this is always going to be the best optionwe multiply this error term by the learning rate, land add this value to Q a,s for a more gradual convergence on the correct value. Why do we pick actions randomly? The reason to not always pick the next state or action in a deterministic way is basically that our guess about which state is best might be wrong.If one had to identify one idea as central and novel to reinforcement learning, it would undoubtedly be temporal-difference TD learning.

I love studying artificial intelligence concepts while correlating them to psychology — Human behaviour and the brain. Reinforcement learning is no exception.

Our topic of interest — Temporal difference was a term coined by Richard S. To understand the psychological aspects of temporal difference we need to understand the famous experiment — Pavlovian or Classical Conditioning. Ivan Pavlov performed a series of experiments with dogs.

A set of dogs were surgically modified so that their saliva could be measured. These dogs were presented with food unconditioned stimulus — US in response to which excretion of saliva was observed unconditioned response — UR.

This is stimulus-response pair is natural and thus conditioned. Now, another stimulus was added. Right before presenting the food a bell was rung. The sound of bell is a conditioned stimulus CS.

Because this CS was presented to the dog right before the US, after a while it was observed that the dog started salivating at the sound of the bell. This response was called the conditioned response CR. Effectively, Pavolov was successful to make the dog salivate on the sound of bell.

An amusing representation of this experiment was shown in the sitcom — The Office. Based on ISI the whole experiment can be divided into types:. In the series of experiments, it was observed that a lower value of ISI showed a faster and more evident response salivating of dog while a longer ISI showed a weaker response.

By this, we can conclude that to reinforce a stimulus-response pair the interval between the conditioned and unconditioned stimuli shall be less. This forms the basis of the Temporal Difference learning algorithm. Model-dependent RL algorithms namely value and policy iterations work with the help of a transition table. A transition table can be thought of as a life hack book which has all the knowledge the agent needs to be successful in the world it exists in. Naturally, writing such a book is very tedious and impossible in most cases which is why model dependent learning algorithms have little practical use.

Temporal Difference is a model-free reinforcement learning algorithm. This means that the agent learns through actual experience rather than through a readily available all-knowing-hack-book transition table.By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service.

The dark mode beta is finally here. Change your preferences any time. Stack Overflow for Teams is a private, secure spot for you and your coworkers to find and share information.

## Subscribe to RSS

I have successfully implemented a SARSA algorithm both one-step and using eligibility traces using table lookup. In essence, I have a q-value matrix where each row corresponds to a state and each column to an action. At each time-step, a row from the matrix is picked and, depending on policy, an action is picked and updated according to SARSA rules.

My first hypothesis was to create a two-layer network, the input layer having as many input neurons as there are states, and the output layer having as many output neurons as there are actions. Each input would be fully connected to each output. So, in fact, it would look as the matrix above. My input vector would be a 1xn row vector, where n is the number of input neurons. All values in the input vector would be 0, except for the index corresponding to the current state which would be 1.

Meaning that if a greedy policy was picked action 1 should be picked and the connection between the fourth input neuron and the first output neuron should become stronger by:.

According to what I read, the network weights should be used to calculate the Q-value of a state-action pair, but I'm not sure they should represent such values. Especially because I've usually seen weight values only being included between 0 and 1. Summary: your current approach is correct, except that you shouldn't restrict your output values to be between 0 and 1. This page has a great explanation, which I will summarize here. The values in the results vector should indeed represent your neural network's estimates for the Q-values associated with each state.

For this reason, it's typically recommended that you not restrict the range of allowed values to be between zero and one so just sum the values multiplied by connection weights, rather than using some sort of sigmoid activation function.

As for how to represent the states, one option is to represent them in terms of sensors that the agent has or might theoretically have. In the example below, for instance, the robot has three "feeler" sensors, each of which can be in one of three conditions. Together, they provide the robot with all of the information it's going to get about which state it's in.

However, if you want to give your agent perfect information, you can imagine that it has a sensor that tells it exactly which state it is in, as shown near the end of this page.The algorithm is used to guide a player through a user-defined 'grid world' environment, inhabited by Hungry Ghosts. Progress can be monitored via the built-in web interface, which continuously runs games using the latest strategy learnt by the algorithm. The algorithm's objective is to obtain the highest possible score for the player.

The player's score is increased by discovering the exit from the environment, and is decreased slightly with each move that is made. A large negative penalty is applied if the player is caught by one of the ghosts before escaping. The game finishes when the player reaches an exit, or is caught by a ghost. The video below shows the algorithm's progress learning a very basic ghost-free environment.

During the first few games the player's moves are essentially random, however after playing about games the player begins to take a reasonably direct route to the exit. After games the algorithm has discovered an optimal route. As would be expected, when tested against more complex environments the algorithm takes much longer to discover the best strategy 10s or s of thousands of games.

In some cases quite ingenious tactics are employed to evade the ghosts, for example waiting in one location to draw the ghosts down a particular path, before taking a different route towards the exit:. To run the code for yourself just clone the project from GitHubdraw your own map in the main. Use Ctrl-C to stop the application, next time the code is run it will continue from where it left off. In order to monitor progress you can start the web interface like this:.By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service.

The dark mode beta is finally here. Change your preferences any time. Stack Overflow for Teams is a private, secure spot for you and your coworkers to find and share information. I am now trying to extend it to use eligibility traces, but the results I obtain are worse than with one-step.

Ie: The algorithm converges at a slower rate and the final path followed by the agent is longer. According to whether I want to use one-step or ET I use either of the two definitions of dw. I am not sure where I am going wrong. Defines the weight change for all weights in the network Ie: The change in value for all Q s,a pairswhich is then fed into the network adjusted by the learning-rate.

Learn more.

## Reinforcement Learning — Cliff Walking Implementation

Asked 4 years, 11 months ago. Active 6 months ago. Viewed times. I should add that initially my weights and e-values are set to 0. Any advice? Maxim MrD MrD 4, 9 9 gold badges 39 39 silver badges 65 65 bronze badges.

Active Oldest Votes. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown. The Overflow Blog. Featured on Meta. Community and Moderator guidelines for escalating issues via new response…. Feedback on Q2 Community Roadmap. Technical site integration observational experiment live on Stack Overflow. Dark Mode Beta - help us root out low-contrast and un-converted bits.

Related Hot Network Questions. Question feed. Stack Overflow works best with JavaScript enabled.

## thoughts on “Sarsa implementation”