Marriage is derived from love despite its material necessity. However, the United States marriages have been embellished by sexual desire which forms the basis for accomplishing love. Whereas marriage seemed to be determined by couples, many factors including social norms usually come into play.
Basically, love is the sole architect of the glorification and justification of marriages. As a result of marriages, the most sublime and useful institution dubbed as family is embedded. Families serve as the central and essential education pillars. This implies that mating is the only way to self perpetuate in marriage and it is subjected to degrees of personal indulgence. Thus, home building through marriage is largely a self maintenance matter implying societal evolution.
The societal groups emanate to be a makeup of the entire communal family entity. The individuals found within the society are considered planetary transitory factors. Hence, families work as mediums through which streams of understanding and customs are pouring from a given creation to the other. This paper critically analyzes personal life experiences in regards to issues confronting families and marriages in the USA.
Transition in our family life and marriage
Due to expressive and corporeal connections between a female and her progenies, a wife is bound to rely on a man or her husband. This pushes her into the matrimonial home or shelter safety. Thirty years ago, it was not the feeling of affection which compelled man to be engrossed in a matrimonial affair, but the desire for foodstuff that initially absorbed male allies to women and the safe haven they shared with the kids (Duncan & Goddard, 2010). A simple USA family emerges when the affiliations between the mother and the kids are accepted. For instance, in every family it is apparent that the association between a child and a mother is inbred, strong and natural.
These have evidently inhibited women from undergoing through untold adversities and surrender to various strange circumstances. The compelling motherly love acts as the handicapping emotion that often positioned the USA family women into terrific drawbacks as they struggle with their husbands (Bethmann & Kvasnicka, 2011). In situations where both maternal and paternal intuitions are overruling, it is exceptionally hard to hear that the family is let down by sacred obsessions, egotism and aspirations. When a happily married US family works to avoid any antagonisms, the association becomes steadfast.
Indeed, a collaborating family man and woman appear to be exceptionally better than three USA ladies or three gentlemen in assorted ways. However, in the US family, a wife is known to enhance and foster the wellbeing of her family members. It appears that the USA ladies might be compelled into matrimonial domiciles by the parenthood impulses. This implies that the customary laws and the higher might of a man encourage a lady to progressively stay put in her matrimony (Matheson & Rosen, 2012). This argument originates from my marriage experiences where it was very hard to find a husband sharing the house chores with wife. Generally, a wife was left to carry out most duties including taking care of the children and accomplishing personal tasks. While it might be argued that the husband was the US family head, the position of the wife was hardly recognized when we first got married. This is where the society has gone wrong.
This belief is inherent in us, and that those who seem to go against this norm are deemed to be deviant in the US. Most US families are staying together and living happily. In such families, a husband, a wife and children clearly understand one another. Not even a single person is considered to be with neither weird blends of anxious appeal and distrusts nor with derision and misgiving. This problem of kid-bearing is not any more observed by seeing the mother of the infant impure and unsafe. Despite being happily married to their dear husbands, the American women married nearly thirty years ago had no voices and freedoms in the families since families were controlled by men (Duncan & Goddard, 2010). In fact, female companions could hardly defy visualizing unusual or healthier styles of subsistence.
Family and marriage life in USA
For over thirty years in our marital partnership, my wife has been the main source of labour at a determined disadvantage. However, in self perpetuation, we are a happily married couple with three kids. The prevailing way of life in the United States has ensured that the wives are fairly rewarded for being in an obligatory maternity. Marriage and family institutions in the USA recognize sexual equality which is naturally hardly realized in other parts of the world. For example, a wife has ever tried to exercise her marriage rights but she does that at the discretion of the family. From my own experience, when a wife in the USA milieu pursues her marital rights without any cautions, the family is likely to breakup.
The USA have laws that ensure women and children’s rights are protected. When your wife wants to divorce and the court warrants it, the consequential outcome is that the marriage will no longer exist. Still, the husband has to take care of the kids’ needs while a wife looks after the children until they are eighteen years (Liu & Heiland, 2012). To shun such an occurrence throughout our marriage life, we have constantly strived to understand ourselves through regular and fearless consultations. In the USA, the conditional changes currently witnessed have liberated women from any kind of domestic slaveries.
Just like their marriage male counterparts, American women are now liberated to determine their reproduction abilities and enjoy their marital statuses. As a family we had to sit down and agree that we will give birth to three children only. The decision was at our discretion. While incidences of family and marriage life oppressions are still present, our marriage and family life has considerably won the unintended and unconscious fight against economic and social oppression that other USA couples face in their marriages (Ramisch, 2012). During these thirty years of marriage, we have become enlightened individuals with exceptional family life experience but we constantly react against the inequitable mores governing both of us and our position in societal marriages.
At times, we were forced to undergo crucial family tests as we continued to live. Family and marital life has considerably changed in the USA. When we got married, a man was perceived to be the head of the family, and in his absence the wife was expected to guide the family. This has brought about the belief that husbands and wives are equal race reproduction partners (Osborne, Berger & Magnuson, 2012). Therefore, similar to the USA family man, a wife incessantly fights to foster her rights whilst in marriage. Regardless of this, within our family, both of us have endlessly maintained supremacy within own domains. This has been the founding stone for our happy co-existence and a 30-years marriage.
We have shared responsibilities of raising our three children.
The kind of marriage partnership that exists between USA wives and husbands
Just like any other marriage, the reproductive urge used to bring us together to self-perpetuate. Moreover, this enabled us to remain one thing in joint support to form a family and consequently a home. Nevertheless, in our family, we always embrace our personal interests. Despite marital barriers in the USA, we adjusted to work in harmony to ensure that our home is made.
Nonetheless, to put up a glad house, we perceived marriage as a core foundation. It materialized as an opposed collaboration and expression that is routinely denoted by unending communal and lifelong links. We have not been able to evade any ensuing conflicts. We have never gone to an extent of having to divide our three kids or seeking a court divorce. Our problems are solved in-house.
From a personal life experience, marriages among the USA families are sociological and not necessarily biological (Ramisch, 2011). As a result, it is the passion that existed between us that ensured we came together. In our family, we appreciate that we are considered as two separate groups from similar species. In fact, our entire life responses and perspectives ensue to be totally divergent. For instance, in the early stages of our marriage, we were completely unable to really and fully comprehend one another. Whilst a married USA woman might have extra intuition in comparison to her husband, in a family situation the wife is rather less rational. However, in our family unit, the wife relentlessly appeared to be the head of religious activities and an honorable principal as well as customary holder.
This implies that in our marriage and family life, the hands which rocked the home structure silently consorted with fortune (Wood et al., 2012). In essence, the differences in thinking, viewpoints, reactions and nature amid us have been considered very valuable. In our matrimony and family unit, we actually fancy one another be it in corporeal, saintly as well as in coronial life journey.
Usually, as a married couple, our children and other family members we collectively rely on the solutions offered jointly to overcome assorted difficulties and mystifying universal problems (Matheson & Rosen, 2012). Regardless of the fact that different sexes that make marriages to work hardly understand one another, our marriage life partners are well complementing. Although support appears to be less or more individually hostile, for over thirty years our marital affiliation has been able to reproduce and live together as a unit. The USA marriages act as institutions well premeditated to make up sex disparities. In the meantime, it insures race reproduction and affects the evolution continuance. Our family which is a kind of a human institution was born of marriage.
This is because it directly gives rise to the foundation and protection of our home which form the structural USA societal base. Nevertheless, our family is essentially correlated to self maintenance mechanisms. It accrues to be the only race repute trust under the USA civilization mores. In our thirty years marital life, our family acts as the most effective provider of suitable self gratification. Therefore, while most American men derive mutual benefits from marriage, a family is a purely supreme accomplishment for any man (Bethmann & Kvasnicka, 2011).
The USA family and lifelong marital standards
In USA matrimony, kids logically come as upshots of inbred sex-mating which sequentially makes a family to come out involuntarily. The existing society follows the ideals of a family. This denotes that a good society only comes as a result of good families. Conversely, for nearly thirty years of marital life, it is the nature of a wife to be concerned and adore her offsprings. This makes the family to merge and make wives the most anxious parties in backing-up the USA family units and matrimonial existence.
Our matrimonial sexual affairs accrue naturally. However, our American marital life is often under the regulation of the family, courtliness, conceit, possessions and mores such as ethics, morals and religion (Lamanna & Riedmann, 2008). Last, there are ebbs and flows in customs, the family-marriage association solidity similarly alters. Currently, USA marriages have gone ahead into the private phase from the previous material goods phase. When we initially came together, the wife had the protection of her husband given that a woman was perceived as the husband’s chattel.
An American wife also had to obey her husband for similar bases. In spite of such a system’s merits, there was adequate family stability. Thirty years down the line, a wife is no longer considered a property in the USA. Despite this, our marital and family life has been stabilized through the prevailing customs. Irrespective of giving birth to three kids of different sexes, we would not have minded if they were all males or females. Furthermore, the disciplining of our kids instigated at tender age and this made our children to be very obedient. In other marriages and families, children are protected from the ordinary costs of irrational behaviors and this has contributed to insubordination amongst the USA kids. Therefore, from personal life experience, civilized USA parents tend to assume most of their duties thus making children to believe that they have all the rights (Strong, DeVault & Cohen, 2010).
Kids revere their fathers and mothers because of the love, teaching and concern which obviously develop whilst family members support the offspring in their enduring encounter. Truly, our marriage and family experience has been effectively engaged in unremitting family ministry services that are meant for our children.
Marriage institutions in the USA evolve alongside novel socio-economic precepts. In fact, the lives of various families are very pricey whereas kids who happened to be families’ resources are now considered fiscal liabilities. Thus far, the safety of the USA as society still hinges on the escalating enthusiasm of a single generation to actively devote resources to the prospective and next human generations. Family lives which consequently arise from marriages with children persist to be very simulative. Such a family proffers the genetic prolongation of mankind genus.
In cheerfully married USA families, a budding kid seizes the blood-brotherhood principles which simply proceed from societal and ordinary ground, habitat. A family acts as the basic fraternity where kids and their parents learn leniency, open-mindedness and self-sacrifice as well as patience lessons. All these are imperative for the apprehension of brotherhood amongst family members. Therefore, when family life is enforced through strong marital associations, personalities are likely to be stabilized. However, true love among parents and children forms the basis of a good family.
Bethmann, D. & Kvasnicka, M. (2011).
The institution of marriage. Journal of Population Economics, 24(3), 1005-32. Duncan, S. & Goddard, H. (2010). Family life education: Principles and practices for effective outreach.
New York, NY: SAGE Publishers. Lamanna, M., & Riedmann, A.
(2008). Marriages and families: Making choices in a diverse society. New York, Boston: Cengage Learning. Liu, S. & Heiland, F. (2012). Should we get married? The effect of parents’ marriage on out-of-wedlock children.
Economic Inquiry, 50(1), 17-38. Matheson, J. & Rosen, K. (2012). Marriage and family therapy faculty members’ balance of work and personal life. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(2), 394-416. Osborne, C.
, Berger, L. & Magnuson, K. (2012). Family structure transitions and changes in maternal resources and well-being.
Demography, 49(1), 23-47. Ramisch, J. (2012). Marriage and family therapists working with couples who have children with autism. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 38(2), 305-316.
Ramisch, J. (2011). Marriage and family therapists working with couples who have children with autism. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 37(3), 156-180.
Strong, B., DeVault, C., & Cohen, T. (2010).
The marriage and family experience: Intimate relationships in a changing society. New York City, Boston: Cengage Learning. Wood, R., et al.
, (2012). The effects of building strong families: A healthy marriage and relationship skills education program for unmarried parents. Journal of Policy Analysis & Management, 31(2), 228-252.