From the raw data above I can see that all of the antacids tested had a neutralising effect on the hydrochloric acid. The speed of the change in pH can be calculated by using the formula stated above and the raw data collected whilst performing the experiment. Table Three shows the greatest speed of change, in pH, produced by each antacid.
From calculating this and by observing the graph (showing change in pH over time), I can conclude that the greatest change in all the antacids occurred in the first minute after introduction. From this I can also conclude that all the antacids used were ‘fast acting’. However from Table Two ad from the speeds calculated in Table Three, it can be seen that the overall change in pH varies from one antacid to another. This means that even though all of the antacids are fast acting, their effectiveness varies, as they all cause a different overall change in pH.
The graph and table two show that Antacid 6 was by far the most effective antacid. This is as it caused the greatest change in pH in the shortest amount of time – a 7.4 change in pH occurred in 15 minutes.
It also had the greatest speed of action at 6.8 pH units/min. This antacid’s effect only lasts for a short period of time. From the graph and table one it can be seen that the pH begins to plateau 5 minutes after introduction and only changes by 0.1.Antacid six was Milpar (this information was given to me once the experiment had been completed). Milpar is a magnesium based antacid.
This gives the antacid properties ideal for treating excess stomach acid. The liquid is fairly insoluble in water and so is long lasting. This makes it a particularly effective antacid as it is very fast acting, which gives instants relief to the patient, causes a greater pH change, which means it can neutralise large amounts of excessive stomach acid, and is long lasting meaning that should there another be another build up in stomach acid, the antacid is still present to counteract the effects. However the magnesium in the antacid also gives it laxative properties and cause unwanted side-effects.In comparison Antacid 1 was the least effective. It caused an overall change of 0.5 in pH and required 25 minutes to complete. It also produced the slowest speed of action at 0.
1 pH units/min. This antacid is slow acting and causes very little change in pH. This therefore would be a very poor antacid as it would not give instant relief as it takes a longer period of time to work and the acid would remain in the stomach as the antacid has very poor neutralising properties.Antacid 1 was Magnesium Thiosulphate. The magnesium in this antacid would have the same properties as before. However the actual neutralising would be less effective. This antacid also has laxative properties and therefore would be a better laxative than an antacid. Antacid 2 was Rennie.
This antacid’s active ingredients are calcium carbonate and heavy magnesium carbonate. This is antacid was fast acting and caused a relatively high change in pH. The calcium carbonate also counteracts the laxative effects of the magnesium. However it slows down bowel movement and so can cause constipation.Most antacids that contain magnesium are paired with either aluminium or calcium carbonate so counteract its laxative properties. Antacids 3 and 4 were Gaviscon in tablet and liquid form, respectively.
They are both composed of sodium alginate, sodium bicarbonate and calcium carbonate. However the liquid form is highly more effective than the tablets. This down to the surface area of both antacids and this will effect how quickly they work.Antacid 5 was Neucogel. This antacid, along with liquid Gaviscon, are probably the most ideal antacids. This is as they higher the stomach pH back into its normal range in a sufficient time. Therefore these are to two that I would recommend to a patient suffering from indigestion and heartburn.
Where as Antacid 6 is the most effective, it would cause the stomach to turn alkaline. This would mean that the stomach would be unable to carry out its functions. The stomach must be acidic to create ideal conditions for the protease enzymes to work and obtain amino acids. The acidic conditions are also required to kill any foreign bacteria and so prevent infection and illness.To improve this experiment I would use a wider range of antacids that were available to the public. I would compare the data from the solid tablets and from the liquids separately and then compare them to each other. This would help to get a clearer idea for which type of antacid is better.
I would also carry out the experiment for a longer period of time. For example an hour. This is as the graphs for antacids such as Rennie, Neucogel and Gaviscon (liquid) had not plateau off and so there could have been a greater change in their overall change in pH than the ones stated in Table Two.Further more to gain a clearer view on the actions of all the antacids I would run the experiment again but use a range of hydrochloric acid at different pH. From this I could gain an idea on how well the antacids would work in different conditions.ConclusionFrom this experiment I can conclude that all the antacids that were tested worked to neutralise the sample acid.
Also that they all work in different ways. The mechanisms of action vary from one antacid to another, as their active ingredients differ. I can see from my results that some mechanisms of action have a greater effect than others. Furthermore I can say the majority of antacids action occurs in the first 2 minutes of use, making most of them fast acting. However the effectiveness of the antacid depends on how quickly it can return the stomach back to its normal conditions.
Some performed poorly and over performed. The antacids that can cause a change in pH by 2 – 3 are the most ideal.Reference1. http://en.wikipedia.
org/wiki/Antacids – accessed on 14th February 20072. http://familydoctor.org/854.xml – accessed on 14th February 20073. http://www.
nlm.nih.gov.medlineplus/druginfo/uspdi/202047 – accessed on 14th February 20074. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stomach – accessed on 21st February 2007