In today’s time, it is wise to have ethical principles in the counseling fields due to working with people who ethics are not of standards.
There action may range from improper verbiage to the extreme of improper physical contact. In this review, we have two distinctive views to demonstrate models of effective decision-making. Corey’s and his team of authors have adapted two dimension of decision-making models based on ethical principles.The goals for these designs are to ensure ethical protocol to guide the counselor to resolve a favorable outcome for the clients. are motivated by the question “What Shall I Do.
” On the other hand, we have Dolgoff’s and his team of authors who inspired by the question “What is best for my client. ” Even though their perspective loyalties are distinctive, they shared a high regard of ethical virtues and status. Ethical decision-making aids in the process of securing justice for each prospect.The model provides structure to ensure fair and ethical morals by evaluating the complexity of surrounding conditions and implementing proficient ethical standards. How do you distinguish between the treatment of personal integrity and consciousness of a client’s moralistic privileges? In the services of helping others, social counselors are confronted with exercising techniques of resolution that will satisfy the good will of ethical practices without individual prejudices. Handling a scenario without injecting your personal belief system may be a difficult task to render.Fortunately, we have controls that have been standardized to promote universal equality. According to Corey, these six principles, autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, justice, fidelity, and veracity.
Kitchener (1984), Meara and colleagues (1996) These are the core principle ethics focal point is to acknowledge the acts and behaviors of individuals for historical beneficiaries. These fundamental qualities are embedded to improve the character and integrity of a person’s will. Hence, providing an examination rocess that allows answer to the question “What shall I do? ” Reviewing Corey’s six principles, you are able to identify that his model reflects these key components to allow the professional counselor to function at the highest level of professionalism. Dolgoff however has embraced a different philosophy.
The system he embraces has a compassion for the well-being of his client. Therefore, he adapts the seven virtue principles to his models of ethical decision-making. This is one of the main differences that separate their models of decision-making.Their approaches on handling situation alter as well. Corey finds it appropriate to include the client’s insight, which promotes a trusting relationship. He secures this status by informing the client in every stage of the process, promoting the dependent to make an informed decision.
In contrast, Dolgoff involves all the parties that affected by the situation, each group provides truths and recommendations that will provide various options to decide the best outcome for the client.Despite their differences in philosophies and approaches, both share the common goal of following an ethical precedent in hopes that counselor’s have can resolve issues to the highest degree of professionalism. In my opinion, complexity yields when there a constriction of conditions that may not allow the situation to reach the full potential of the circumstances. Corey’s models demonstrate those traits. The model he enforces traps you to limit your scope of prospective outcome. The simplicity of Dolgoff’s model gives trust and comfort that will afford me to make the best decision possible to aid in my client’s defense.
I have been involved in various situations that have allowed me to practice the diligence of Dolgoff decision-making models. For example, working for an addition program that incorporates cognitive behavior model (RET) that operates on “what shall I do”.Reference Dolgoff, R. , Loewenberg, F. M.
, Harrington. D. , (2009). Ethical Decisions for Social Work practice (8th ed. ) Belmont, CA: Thompson Brooks/Cole Corey, G.
, Corey, M. S. , & Callanan, P, (2011). Issue and Ethics in the Helping Professions (8th ed. ) Belmont, CA: Thompson Brooks/Cole